Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accepts Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
SEDEVACANTIST BISHOPS SANBORN AND PIVARUNAS HAVE TO CLOSE SHOP : THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISM ARE TRADITIONAL
31.12.2025
SEDEVACANTIST BISHOPS SANBORN AND PIVARUNAS HAVE TO CLOSE SHOP : THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISM ARE TRADITIONAL
The sedevacantists Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the CMRI , Bishop Donald Sanborn and the late Fr. Anthony Cekada at the MHT seminary and Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, New York, USA interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. For them Lumen Gentium 8 etc is a break with Tradition. So they correctly reject the conclusion of Vatican Council ( irrational), while using the false premise ( LG ,8,14, 16 etc are visible cases they are known in particular people in the present times ) to interpret Lumen Gentium 8 etc.
On the website of the CMRI there is a list of baptism of desire cases. All are interpreted as being visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) . But this is false. In reality the baptism of desire cases are always invisible for us human beings. Bishop Pivarunas and the CMRI continue with the error even after …Altro
You know @Lionel Leslie Andrades you just hit the nail smack dabb on the head with the simple but profound explanation of the false premise! I just get a laugh when I think woah, "invisible people are in fact, not visible!" It seems such a simple statement but it is hidden behind the Marxist double speak of the modernists! Happy New Year!
It's this color-coded "read in between the lines" method that many call the "Vatican II step": state something [seemingly] out of line with tradition, then counter it with something orthodox. People then read & take to heart the part they want and ignore the other {pick & choose = actual meaning of the term heresy]. This is why someone like Mother Angelica or Bishop Fulton Sheen were in favor of the Council documents "if read in the light of tradition." It's also why the modernists assert that the "new Springtime of the Church began in 1965 - like Francis & crew. Benedict XVI tried to fix it with his hermeneutic of continuity. It's a mess.
BISHOP DONALD SANBORN AND MHT- SEDEVACANTISTS HAVE BLOCKED ME ON TWITTER : NO DOCTRINAL DIALOGUE
31.12.2025
BISHOP DONALD SANBORN AND MHT- SEDEVACANTISTS HAVE BLOCKED ME ON TWITTER : NO DOCTRINAL DIALOGUE
Bishop Donald Sanborn sedevacantist, has blocked me on Twitter. I had mentioned that Sister Maria Philomena micm, the Directress of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, interprets LG 8 14, 16 etc in Vatican Council II as being invisible cases and so they are not explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence, 1442. He instead, implies that LG 8, 14, 16 etc are physically visible cases and so they are objective examples of salvation in the present times and so are exceptions for the dogma EENS.
So we have two interpretations of Vatican Council II hers and his. She is rational and he is irrational. Sister Maria Philomena and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Philomena Convent are traditionalists who are rational and non schismatic on Vatican Council II unlike the sedevacantists, …Altro
FERNANDEZ, LIBASSI AND LAIRE ESCAPE A DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS AND PRECEPTS BY BEING DISHONEST: THEY COERCED THE SLAVES OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY IN NH
30.12.2025
FERNANDEZ, LIBASSI AND LAIRE ESCAPE A DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS AND PRECEPTS BY BEING DISHONEST : THEY COERCED THE SLAVES OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY IN NH
If Fr. Georges de Laire did not interpret CCC 847-848 and Vatican Council II (AG 7) dishonestly then he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS, like the St. Benedict Center NH. So he would be eligible to have the Decree issued against him. It would be the same for Bishop Libasci and his Curia. Now he personally escaped a Decree of Prohibitions being issued against him, by being unethical.
No Catholic is safe in New Hampshire.This is coercion. It is not Catholic. It is political and ideological.
They were being coerced with a legal Decree of Prohibitions and Precepts. They were being forced to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 ( saved in invincible ignorance) as a practical exception, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) defined by Church Councils ( 1215,1442).This is irrational. It is dishonest. …Altro
HOW IS HOLY MASS BEING OFFERED IN THE DIOCESE OF MANCHESTER IN NEW HAMPSHIRE?
29.12.2025
HOW IS HOLY MASS BEING OFFERED IN THE DIOCESE OF MANCHESTER IN NEW HAMPSHIRE?
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, accept and interpret , Magisterial Documents rationally, traditionally, non schismatically and honestly. But Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, Fr. Georges de Laire the Judicial Vicar and the rest of the Curia do not do the same.
Canonically, the bishop and Curia must affirm in public, the Nicene Creed, the Apostles Creed and the Athanasius Creed, in their original understanding. They don’t. Instead Fr. Georges de Laire has placed legal prohibitions upon the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and indicates that the issue is doctrinal. They affirm the dogma EENS in the original. He does not. They interpret the baptism of desire as being invisible cases in 2025-2026. For him the baptism of desire is an exception for the dogma EENS. So he implies it is not an invisible case. The Athanasius …Altro
Blah blah blah blah
Very nice link introducing these wonderful faithful Roman Catholic sisters!
NEW FACTS HAVE COME TO LIGHT IN THE MICHAEL VORIS - GEORGES DE LAIRE CASE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
27.12.2025
NEW FACTS HAVE COME TO LIGHT IN THE MICHAEL VORIS - GEORGES DE LAIRE CASE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
Now we have two new important facts 1 about Vatican Council II which were not known in the case filed by Fr. Georges de Laire against Michael Voris.
The reports by Christopher White of the National Catholic Reporter and Simcha and Damien Fisher were biased during the trial. They interpreted the Council irrationally like Fr. Georges de Laire.
There still is no correction or apology, from all of them and neither from the Vatican.
Fr. Laire was presenting dogma as being heresy,as was mentioned in the original article on Church Militant TV which the judge did not consider. Laire was then forcing this lie upon Brother Andre Maire micm, the Prior at the St.Benedict Center and upon Michael Voris and Church Militant TV . - Lionel Andrades
1
I
IF WE CHOOSE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II AND OTHER MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS AS NOT HAVING EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS, VATICAN …Altro
Wow! Scary stuff that it has come to this! Bishops using Canon law to force
Roman Catholics to accept heresy! God forbid it! Saint Benedict, pray for us!
SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT HER FATHER WAS EXPELLED BY BOSTON COLLEGE WHICH IS IRRATIONAL ON THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISMS.
27.12.2025
SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT HER FATHER WAS EXPELLED BY BOSTON COLLEGE WHICH IS IRRATIONAL ON THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISMS.
Boston College today interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II irrationally unlike Sister Marie Terese.
Today Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally by Boston College and the USCCB. So the Council is wrongly projected as a break with Tradition when it really is in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism.
Boston College has still not apologized for expelling four Catholic professors and Fr. Leonard Feeney.The professors included the father of Sister Marie Therese, M.I.C.M. She is part of the group which appealed to the Vatican to lift the prohibition placed upon them. In February 2021, the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) held that the appeal had not been completed before the statute of limitations ran out; therefore the group must conform to the precepts it is reported.The CDF did …Altro
Good read in favor of Catholic teaching!
Awesome!
JUDICIAL VICAR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II DISHONESTLY AND HAS PLACED SANCTIONS ON A RELIGIOUS SISTER WHO DOES NOT
26.12.2025
JUDICIAL VICAR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II DISHONESTLY AND HAS PLACED SANCTIONS ON A RELIGIOUS SISTER WHO DOES NOT
Fr. Georges de Laire Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, placed a Decree of Prohibitions upon a religious sister who interprets Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Creeds rationally, traditionally and non schismatically – while he and Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop in NH, do not do so. He is in schism with the Magisterium of the Middle Ages. She is not.
The Prohibitions have been placed upon Sister Maria Philomena micm, the Directress of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, NH at the St. Benedict Center in NH.
The legal prohibitions were placed upon the community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in 2019 and since have not be lifted.
The good Sister refuses to recant since she ia affirming all Magisterial Documents rationally, including Vatican Council II , the …Altro
Always interesting and edifying read!
Fr. Georges de Laire interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. This is dishonest. He does it still. There is no denial from the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester, USA.
25.12.2025
Fr. Georges de Laire interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. This is dishonest. He does it still. There is no denial from the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester, USA. They do the same. For all of them, ‘the red is an exception for the blue’. This is a canonical issue. The Diocese must interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms only rationally .
Laire issued a Decree of Precepts and Prohbitions in 2019against the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the religious community at the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire . It is still not lifted. They held the strict, traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442. This Council did not mention any exceptions. So EENS is now aligned with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’, as held by the community in New Hampshire.
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the …Altro
EVIDENCE SHOWS FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE MADE A DOCTRINAL MISTAKE DURING THE MICHAEL VORIS CASE AND THE PROHIBITIONS AGAINST THE ST.BENEDICT CENTER IN NH.
24.12.2025
EVIDENCE SHOWS FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE MADE A DOCTRINAL MISTAKE DURING MICHAEL VORIS CASE AND WHEN THE DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS WAS ISSUED AGAINST THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER, RICHMOND, NEW HAMPSHIRE, USA.
Evidence now shows that Fr. Georges de Laire the Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, USA made an objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechisms, the baptism of desire, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc when he issued a harsh Decree of Prohibitions against the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA. The proof is out.
He has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’ while the religious community affirms the same Council but with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue’. So the passages in red do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, blue and neither the Athanasius Creed, blue. They also do not contradict, in general, the …Altro
Your work @Lionel Leslie Andrades is so very important! It is clear to me that the irrational interpretation has had a catastrophic effect on the Catholic Church. It is almost as if it is the root error of Vatican 2!
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE WHO ISSUED A LEGAL DECREE AGAINST THE ST.BENEDICT CENTER NH HAS TO AFFIRM TRADITIONAL SALVATION-THEOLOGY LIKE THEM
24.12.2025
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE WHO ISSUED A LEGAL DECREE AGAINst THE ST.BENEDICT CENTER NH Now has to affirm traditional salvation-theology LIKE THEM
vatican council ii rational and blue supports the traditionalists in richmond , new hampshire.
Fr. Georges de Laire, who has issued a Decree of Prohibitions and Precepts against the St. Benedict Center is now saying outside the Church there is no salvation according to Vatican Council II blue. He does not have an option.
He is also affirming the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) with hypothetical cases of CCC 847-848 ( saved in invincible ignorance) not being exceptions for CCC 845-846.
So Vatican Council Ii, with hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc do not have objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as held by the St, Benedict Center in New Hampshire.
So the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center can affirm Feeneyite EENS along with Vatican Council …Altro
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ, BISHOP PETER LIBASI AND FR. GEORGES LAIRE, TRY TO FORCE VATICAN COUNCIL II RED UPON A RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY WHICH CHOOSES VATICAN COUNCIL II, BLUE
23.12.2025
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ, BISHOP PETER LIBASI AND FR. GEORGES LAIRE, TRY TO FORCE VATICAN COUNCIL II RED UPON A RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY WHICH CHOOSES VATICAN COUNCIL II, BLUE
Sister Marie Philomena micm, Directoress of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom in New Hampshire is a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II.For her it is Vatican Council II, blue.
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in NH accept all Magisterial Documents interpreted rationally unlike Pope Leo and the local bishop. A Decree of Prohibitions has been issued against the religious community at the St. Benedict Center NH by the Vatican.
Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, must clarify for the people in NH if he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism, red or blue, irrational or rational, and is this honest, Catholic and legal.
He presently forces the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to also interpret …Altro
CATHOLICS MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE LIKE THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER IN NH AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II RED LIKE THE SSPX.
23.12.2025
CATHOLICS MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE LIKE THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER IN NH AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II RED LIKE THE SSPX.
There is a major shift in theology in the Catholic Church.
Rahner, Ratzinger and Balthazar are contradicted by Vatican Council II blue.
The traditionalist at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire are now the mainstream Catholic Church, with Vatican Council II and EENS, only blue.
Why should we as Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with the red and not Vatican Council II blue like the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire?
The traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center in the diocese of Manchester now have the mainline theology with the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, blue. Cardinal Muller, Balthazar, Ratzinger, Bishop Barron and Larry Chapp with Vatican II, red are schismatic and obsolete. There can only be a lex orandi with Vatican Council II blue.
We can now interpret Vatican Council II rationally like the SBC or irrationally like …Altro
FOR MOTHER TERESA IT WAS VATICAN COUNCIL RED BUT FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C AND FR. JAN TIMOR M.C TODAY IT IS VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE.
22.12.2025
FOR MOTHER TERESA IT WAS VATICAN COUNCIL RED BUT FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C AND FR. JAN TIMOR M.C TODAY IT IS VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE.
At every Mass and liturgy the ecclesiology is exclusivist and traditional for the Missionaries of Charity, since the Council is no more liberal.
Mission for the M.C’s is now not only Christocentric but also Ecclesiocentric. Membership in the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation.
We now have ‘a blue Church’. Those who go for the Latin Mass are now mainline but so are those who go for the Novus Ordo Mass, when the ecclesiology is only blue.
This means Fr. Sebastian Vazhakhala from Kerala will no more be able to interpret Vatican Council II like the Indian Bishops Conferences. Neither will Fr. Jan Timor be able to interpret Vatican Council II, like Hans Urs Balthazar, for whom the red was an exception for the blue.
Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Kung, Lubac Ratzinger and Lehmann are now obsolete and so are Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre …Altro
WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II ‘BLUE’ THE MINIM FATHERS IN ROME ARE ALIGNED WITH ALPHONSE RATISBONNE AND TERESA DI LISEUX : THE COUNCIL IS MISSIONARY
22.12.2025
WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II ‘BLUE’ THE MINIM FATHERS IN ROME ARE ALIGNED WITH ALPHONSE RATISBONNE AND TERESA DI LISEUX : THE COUNCIL IS MISSIONARY
With ‘the blue orthodox passages’ in Vatican Council II , the Council is saying Hinduism, Buddhism and Islamism are not paths to salvation and their members need ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7) for salvation from Hell. Meanwhile there are no explicit exceptions for AG 7, LG 8,14, 16 etc.
Since ‘the red passages’ i.e. being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, refer to hypothetical cases in 1965-2025.
So the Minim Fathers of St. Francis of Paula, at the basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte, Rome, will be confirming that Islamism, Shintoism etc are not paths to salvation. They are aligned with Alphonse Ratisbonne, a missionary, St. Teresa of Liseuex, patron of the missions and St. Maximillian Kolbe, the editor of a missionary Polish magazine. All three have been to this basilica in central Rome.
Vatican Council II is …Altro
VATICAN COUNCIL II INDICATES ISLAM IS NOT A PATH TO SALVATION : TRADITIONALISTS AND SEDEVACANTISTS MUST CLARIFY
21.12.2025
VATICAN COUNCIL II INDICATES ISLAM IS NOT A PATH TO SALVATION : TRADITIONALISTS AND SEDEVACANTISTS MUST CLARIFY
It is important that sedevacantists decide that they will not project the red passages as exceptions for the blue one. They are not exceptions. Then Vatican Council II will have a continuity with the past. There will not be schism in the name of Vatican Council II, irrational i.e. with the red passages being projected as exceptions for the blue ones, but also exceptions, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Vatican Council II will then have a continuity with the past. The traditionalists will be in the mainline Catholic Church since the Council will no more be liberal.
Pope Leo and Cardinal Cupich will not be able to support their liberalism any more with the Council emerging rational. So then the Society of St. Pius X can always interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Pope Pius X (Catechism) and Pope Pius IX (Syllabus).
So the traditionalists …Altro
FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C LUMEN GENTIUM 16 REFERS TO AN INVISIBLE CASE SO IT IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE ATHANASIUS CREED WHICH IS SUPPORTED BY AD GENTES 7
20.12.2025
FOR FR. SEBASTIAN VAZHAKHALA M.C LUMEN GENTIUM 16 REFERS TO AN INVISIBLE CASE SO IT IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE ATHANASIUS CREED WHICH IS SUPPORTED BY AD GENTES 7
Invisible people in 2025-2026 cannot be visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.
Hypothetical and invisible cases cannot be visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
If someone is not there he cannot be an exception for anything. If there is an apple in a box of oranges it is an exception because it is different but also because it is there in that box at that time. If it was not there it would not be exception.
For Fr. Sebastian Vazhakhala mc. is the Superior of the Missionaries of Charity Contemplative Brothers of Mother Teresa at Ponte Galleria, Rome and co Founder of the community with Mother Teresa. He said there are no visible cases of the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance.
So he is telling us that LG 14 and LG 16 in Vatican …Altro
FR. CHAD RIPPERGER, JESSE ROMERO AND TERRY BARBER WOULD BE INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL II, THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND THE CREEDS IRRATIONALLY
FR.CHAD RIPPERGER, JESSE ROMERO AND TERRY BARBER AFFIRM THE DOGMA EENS WHICH IS IN HARMONY WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH - BUT WITH CONFUSION
However 15 hypothetical cases which he has mentioned could be confused as practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It could also mean that he is interpreting Vatican Coiuncil II irrationally by confusing hypothetical cases of LG 14, 16 etc are being visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This would indicate that he interprets the baptism of desire irrationally too. So his interpretation of the Creeds too would be with the irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire. This is the common mistake in the Church.
Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation is a formally defined doctrine of the Church. Unless you are a formally baptized Catholic in the Church you cannot be saved. The ordinary means of salvation is the Catholic Church said Fr. Chad Ripperger on …Altro
As usual a slam dunk!
With Vatican Council II ( rational ) the SSPX is in the mainline Catholic Church which can no more be liberal.
With Vatican Council II ( rational ) the SSPX is in the mainline Catholic Church which can no more be liberal. The Council has changed. This is known here at the Vatican and Pope Leo and the Holy See Press Office are not responding. Neither are the traditionalists and the sedevacantists.
The mainline Catholic Church is liberal today because Vatican Council II is liberal. The SSPX and the MHT sedevacantists interpret ‘the red passages as exceptions for the blue orthodox ones ‘ in Vatican Council II. This is irrational. It has to change
When the SSPX and the sedevacantists interpret ‘the red as not being an exception for the blue’, the Council is no more liberal.
This is a sea change in the Catholic Church. We return automatically to the ecclesiology of St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine. We side step the irrational theology of the popes from Paul VI to Leo XIV.
09.12.2025
POPE LEO’S INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II PRODUCES POLARIZATION : GERMAN MEDIA NOT CORRECTED
POPE …Altro
Correction... the RED IS AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
WHERE IS ST. THOMAS MORE TODAY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN ENGLAND ?
17.12.2025
WHERE IS ST. THOMAS MORE TODAY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN ENGLAND ?
When King Henry VIII wanted to marry Anne Boleyn and the pope said no, he threatened to kill all the English cardinals and seize their property. All winked. Except for one.
Today not a single cardinal will tell Ofsted and the Islamic groups that Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refers only to a hypothetical case. It refers to someone invisible in London in 2025-2026.
‘Not a single cardinal except St. Thomas More’. Sounds familiar?
Not a single cardinal in Britain will say that hypothetical cases of being saved ‘in imperfect communion with the Church ‘Unitatis Redigratio 3, are not exceptions for the dogma EENS.
The Decree on Ecumenism, in Vatican Council II, is not an exception for Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II. Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
Lumen Gentium 16 cannot be an explicit exception for Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), but ‘…Altro
CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY HIT BY RELIGIOUS INDIFFERENCE IN ROME
16.12.2025
CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY HIT BY RELIGIOUS INDIFFERENCE IN ROME
Fr.Jan Timor, or Timo, as he is affectionately called, defends a Catholic religious community and house for the poor in Rome, from being taken over by non Christians, atheists and secularists.
A good homilist, fluent in languages he stands in the place of the Superior Fr. Stephen who is in Ghana for Christmas.
Fr. Timo, the German MC priest of Mother Teresa, is on his way to Israel. He is to be the Superior of the M.C community in Nazareth. The Missionaries of Charity Contemplative Brothers Home in Nazareth, is near the site where the Angel Gabriel appeared to Our Lady.
But Timor may have to stay at Casa Serena the M.C Home for the Aged, this Christmas. Here the bigger problem is the existence of Casa Serena itself. It was founded by Fr. Sebastian Vazhakhala M.C and Mother Teresa nearly 50 years back.
SURROUNDINGS HAVE CHANGED
The surroundings of Casa Sera have changed. It is no more Catholic as it was in 1978…Altro