Il Messaggero interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally: there is no denial from Roberto Napoletano, Franca Giansoldati and the Editorial Dept.

August 8,2026
Il Messaggero interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally: there is no denial from Roberto Napoletano, Franca Giansoldati and the Editorial Dept.
There is no acknowledgement of the error. An injustice has been done to the SSPX and traditionalists. The Council interpreted rationally supports Tradition and not liberalism.
Over the year there has also been no denial from the Vatican Department of Communications and the Holy See Press Office.
Pope Leo seems to agree that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical and theoretical cases. So they cannot be objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442 and neither for the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass.
The Council is dogmatic (AG 7/EENS) and ecclesiocentric (AG 7/ EENS) and would be aligned with the EENS of Fr. Davide Pagliarani Superior General of the SSPX or, Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA.
This is what AI o X calls Andrades’ discovery.
The Holy See has not referred to Andrades’ discovery that LG 8, 14, 16 etc are only hypothetical and invisible in 2026 and so the Council is aligned with the Latin Mass which is Feeneyite on EENS and not the Novus Ordo Mass which is Cushingite on EENS. The Missal of Pope Paul VI does not affirm Feeneyite EENS like the Athanasius Creed, etc interpreted only rationally.
It means that the Council supported Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney and not Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Fr. Karl Rahner and Pope Paul VI.
Cardinal Reina Baldasarre, the Vicar General of Rome knows about this issue. He interprets LG 8, 14, 16 as being theoretical.
It means the newspapers in Italy cannot continue to publish reports with Vatican Council II interpreted with LG 16 visible instead of visible. Also all the books on Vatican Council II at the SSPX centers make the same error.
We now have an alternative, we can interpret Vatican Council II like Lionel Andrades and it is aligned with the past Magisterium, and so is apostolic. It is in harmony with the all the Catechisms interpreted rationally.
- Lionel Andrades


Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Lefebvre and Feeney that Vatican Council II supports them instead of his friends Rahner and Kung
07.08.2026
Extracts from AI on X at Lionel Andrades' channel.

06.08.2026 Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists, the newspapers must note: apology due to the SSPX

x.com/i/grok?conversation=2085348729851121968

Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Lefebvre and …

06.08.2026
Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists, the newspapers must note: apology due to the SSPX
Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists, …

5.08.2026

IL MESSAGGERO REPORTS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE IRRATIONAL, POLITICAL AND DISHONEST. THERE IS A RATIONAL AND HONEST ALTERNATIVE

IL MESSAGGERO REPORTS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE …

SSPX CHAPEL IN ROME :. NETWORKING IS NEEDED, MEDIA HAS TO BE MONITORED, PRESS RELEASES ISSUED
04.08.2026

SSPX CHAPEL IN ROME :. NETWORKING IS NEEDED, …
116