DrMaria
1192.6K
01:02:16
Very Important from Sr. Lucy Truth. Excellent summary. Please pass on to others on social media. Thank you!
Credo .
@DrMaria No way Hosay! Keep your conspiratorial rubbish to yourself!
Livinus Ugwu shares this
7875
salliperson
This woman does not look like the original Sr. Lucy.
Liam Ronan
@salliperson Perhaps, but I don't look like the original me anymore either.
Carolan
@Liam Ronan but has your entire face and teeth changed shape? Get real! Nothing about these two is the same. I'm 50 lbs thinner than I was 40 years ago and you can still see the similarities in pics from then and now.
Liam Ronan
@Carolan But, to what end is all of this speculation? Suppose you could establish 100% that it was not the real Sister Lucy. Then what? What exactly? I do not for a minute think the whole Third Secret was revealed.
I do; however, wish I was 50 lbs. thinner than I was 40 years ago. The only thinner thing about me is my hair. 😉
giveusthisday
I believe Sister Lucy was switched; PaulVI as well. ? To force through Vatican II changes? To allow New World Church to come into being? In any case it becomes very clear Our Lady's message, and that of Sister Lucy before the switch are extremely important, as is the third secret!
Credo .
@giveusthisday Check out photographs of Pope Benedict XV1 at the age of 16 when he was accepted into the seminary in 1943. Then ordained as a Priest in 1951 at the age of 24. (I am reminding you of this to show how facial expression can change from youth to elderly.) Next, hone in on Tradition In Action; The Pope with the evil eyes. Our Lord showed us the individual who I describe as The Holy Father …More
@giveusthisday Check out photographs of Pope Benedict XV1 at the age of 16 when he was accepted into the seminary in 1943. Then ordained as a Priest in 1951 at the age of 24. (I am reminding you of this to show how facial expression can change from youth to elderly.) Next, hone in on Tradition In Action; The Pope with the evil eyes. Our Lord showed us the individual who I describe as The Holy Father in front of a multitude that was cheering him. But there was a difference from a true holy Father, His devilish gaze. - This one had the gaze of evil, Pope Benedict's 'evil eyes' are still on T.I.A. for the world to see. Tradition In Action also published numerous lies (scandals) promoting the 2 Sister Lucia's. 🤔
Credo .
Ven. Sr. Lucia of Fatima Pray for the conversion of poor sinners!.
Paul F
One doesn't need to be a sedevacantist or conspiracy theorist to see the obvious: it simply isn't the same person. Seriously weird.
SHJ-IHM
Some day I'll delve into all of the details to try to determine the truth. But, in the meantime, she sure looks completely different - and changed her tune - after 1959.
English Catholic
@SHJ-IHM Sister Lucia didn't apparently 'change her tune' until after the 1984 consecration. All the previous consecrations performed by various Popes, she declared did not fulfil Our Lady's request made at Fatima. On Thursday, March 22, 1984, two days before the 1984 Consecration, the Carmel of Coimbra was celebrating Sister Lucia's seventy-seventh birthday. She received on that day, as was her …More
@SHJ-IHM Sister Lucia didn't apparently 'change her tune' until after the 1984 consecration. All the previous consecrations performed by various Popes, she declared did not fulfil Our Lady's request made at Fatima. On Thursday, March 22, 1984, two days before the 1984 Consecration, the Carmel of Coimbra was celebrating Sister Lucia's seventy-seventh birthday. She received on that day, as was her custom, her old friend Mrs. Eugenia Pestana. After extending good wishes to her Carmelite friend, Mrs. Pestana asked, "Then Lucia, Sunday is the Consecration?" Sister Lucia, who had already received and read the text of the Pope's 1984 consecration formula made a negative sign and declared "That consecration cannot have a decisive character." After the 1984 consecration, reports were made that Sister Lucia was saying that the 1984 Consecration had not been fulfilled. 1985: In Sol de Fatima, the Spanish publication of the Blue Army, Sister Lucia was asked if the Pope had fulfilled the request of Our Lady when he consecrated the world the previous year. Sister Lucia replied: “There was no participation of all the bishops, and there was no mention of Russia.” She was then asked, “So the consecration was not done as requested by Our Lady?” to which she replied: “No. Many bishops attached no importance to this act.” 1987: On July 20, 1987 Sister Lucia was interviewed quickly outside her convent while voting. She told journalist Enrique Romero that the Consecration of Russia has not been done as requested. One could cite more of Lucia’s affirmations that the 1984 consecration of the world (and that of 1982) did not fulfill Heaven’s conditions, but the point is made. Read Christopher Ferrara's book 'False Friends of Fatima', especially page 51. A free PDF of the book is available here: False Friends of Fatima | The Fatima Center (scroll down and click on PDF link).
Liam Ronan
@English Catholic New Fatima Revelation?
August 19, 2014 - The National Catholic Register by Pat Archbold "New Fatima Revelation"?...Italian journalist Antonio Socci reveals some new text reportedly written by Sister Lucia of Fatima...
"Towards 16:00 hours on January 3rd, 1944, in the convent’s chapel, before the Tabernacle, Lucia asked Jesus to let her know His will: ‘I then feel that a friendly …More
@English Catholic New Fatima Revelation?

August 19, 2014 - The National Catholic Register by Pat Archbold "New Fatima Revelation"?...Italian journalist Antonio Socci reveals some new text reportedly written by Sister Lucia of Fatima...

"Towards 16:00 hours on January 3rd, 1944, in the convent’s chapel, before the Tabernacle, Lucia asked Jesus to let her know His will: ‘I then feel that a friendly hand, affectionate and maternal, touches my shoulder.’

It is ‘the Mother of Heaven’ who says to her: ‘be at peace and write what they command you to, but not that which you were given to understand about its meaning,’ intending to allude to the meaning of the vision that the Virgin herself had revealed to her.

Right after – says Sr. Lucia – ‘I felt my spirit flooded by a light-filled mystery which is God and in Him I saw and heard: the point of the flame-like lance which detaches, touches the axis of the earth and it [the earth] shakes: mountains, cities, towns and villages with their inhabitants are buried. The sea, rivers and clouds leave their bounds, they overflow, flood and drag with them into a whirlpool, houses and people in a number unable to be counted; it is the purification of the world from the sin it is immersed in. Hatred, ambition, cause detructive wars. Afterward I felt in the increased beating of my heart and in my spirit a quiet voice which said: ‘in time, one faith, one baptism, one Church, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic. Heaven in eternity!’ This word, ‘Heaven,’ filled my heart with peace and happiness, so much so that, almost without realizing it, I continued to repeat for some time: Heaven, Heaven!’

That is how she was given the strength to write the Third Secret.

Antonio Socci suggests that this diary entry seems to lend credence to the assertion of his 2006 book that there were indeed two parts to the Fatima revelation, one of which is the vision of the "Bishop in white" released in the year 2000 and another part, perhaps composed at a different time and sent later and thus not considered part of the 'secret' by some in the Vatican, that contains the 'meaning of the vision.'
English Catholic
@Liam Ronan I was already aware of this. It was published in the book from the Carmel of Coimbra 'A Pathway Under the Gaze of Mary' p.244, which I have. It is similar to a quote from Pope John Paul II made in Fulda, Germany in 1980. I posted both of them a while back: Fatima / Third Secret quotes from Sister Lucia and Pope John Paul II
English Catholic
This is posted from another thread when I commented on this issue:- New evidence in the case of the replacement of Sr.…
Recently, Chojnowski had a video on Life Site News. That ‘Two Sister Lucy’s’ video is presented as stunning new evidence, it’s just the same old, same old, which Peter Chojnowski pushes on any platform he can. I’m sorry LifeSite News gave this an even larger platform. I fear …More
This is posted from another thread when I commented on this issue:- New evidence in the case of the replacement of Sr.…

Recently, Chojnowski had a video on Life Site News. That ‘Two Sister Lucy’s’ video is presented as stunning new evidence, it’s just the same old, same old, which Peter Chojnowski pushes on any platform he can. I’m sorry LifeSite News gave this an even larger platform. I fear Chojnowski will end up discrediting Fatima altogether. The only thing I learnt from the LifeSite video that I didn’t already know (or had possibly forgotten, but I have no memory of it) was that World Apostolate of Fatima member Carlos Evaristo allegedly went to the police and asked them to investigate, as he thought the Sister Lucia he saw was an imposter? This doesn’t add up. Even if it were true that Evaristo went to the police, why would the Portuguese police send him to an American civilian – Dr Zugibe – a man who first met Sr Lucia post 1967 (I think he met her in 2002), thus he would have met the supposed ‘fake’ Sr Lucia, having never met the ‘real’ one, so how and why would he be qualified in the eyes of the police to be able to tell the difference? And how on earth would the Portuguese police even know of this American layman’s existence?

Also, if Carlos Evaristo didn’t believe that this was Sister Lucia, why is he still in the World Apostolate of Fatima, still pushing the Vatican party line on the Consecration and 3rd Secret, still maintaining that the Sister Lucia who died in 2005 and is buried in the Basilica is the real one? I met Evaristo in Fatima in the late 1980’s. He had a large collection of relics and we were taken to see them. Also, I saw him again in 2017 working in Domus Pacis – the HQ of the WAF. I didn’t speak with him, but it was him. I went to the WAF chapel because it contains the actual statues of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart which were in the original chapel in Tuy when the Trinitarian vision took place to Sr Lucia in 1929, and I always like to say a prayer in front of them. I certainly wouldn’t use WAF for anything else. But why would Evaristo still be in the WAF HQ if he thought Sister Lucia was a fake?

Also, if Sr Lucia was ‘switched’, so many people – including all who had ever known or met her, the Pope, many Cardinals, bishops and priests, all the Carmelite nuns she lived with, her living relatives like Maria do Fetal Neves Rosa, and some childhood friends like Mrs Eugenia Pestana – would have had to be in on it, as to make it impossible. Someone, somewhere would have blown the whistle. No-one ever has. Even the Vatican hasn’t got that much power to silence everyone.

As for Sister Lucia’s accent, which Chojnowski alleged has changed – she lived in Coimbra and Spain for a long time, and accents do change. I have noticed that some people absorb accent changes like a sponge, while others don’t so much, if at all. I thought Chojnowski said they had pinpointed the accent of the ‘fake’ Sr Lucia to Viseu. But Viseu is not far from Coimbra Carmel. He made it sound as though it were right up the other end of the country. Bear in mind Sr Lucia had been in Coimbra Carmel since the 1940’s. Plenty of time for her to absorb any local accent, if indeed she did. I’d also be surprised if the Viseu accent would be noticeably different.

I don’t trust the photographic ‘evidence’ either. People do change. I remember when I went to visit my friend in hospital. I hadn’t seen her for a while, and walked straight past her bed because I just didn’t recognise her. Even when I asked the nurse and went to her bed, I still found it hard to believe it was her, until she recognised me and spoke. We can all get ‘experts’ to say what we want them to. I would have thought we would all be very wary of ‘experts’ these days. Look how many qualified ‘experts’ told us to get covid-vaccinated.

Also – think about it – if the Vatican had placed a compliant fake in there, why was she forbidden to see anyone without Vatican permission and all her publicly released writings had to be vetted by the Vatican as well? If it was a fake, singing from the same hymn sheet as those who planted her there, they surely wouldn’t have been so concerned about isolating her, and would have made far more use of her to confirm that the Consecration had been done and the full 3rd Secret released. As it was, the Vatican always relied on the same very scant, non-verifiable evidence allegedly from Sr Lucia to confirm their version of events (in fact, as Christopher Ferrara has pointed out, everything points to these ‘proofs’ as being fake. That seems far more likely to me – I think he even named one of the culprits as Msgr Guerra, who used to be the Shrine Director).

I still maintain regarding Sister Lucia, that it’s a case of an elderly religious, who took her vow of obedience very seriously, being manipulated by elements in the Vatican. She has stated in her books that she was only the witness and not the interpreter of the Fatima events. Even if she thought the Vatican had misinterpreted various elements, and even if she had privately corrected any misinterpretations, they would never have seen the light of day. Sadly, in her latter years, it appears she might have, to some degree, accepted what was fed to her from the Vatican through her superiors about various things. People also seem to think that Sr Lucia is in some way infallible, which of course, she isn’t. Age, confusion, pressure from the Vatican, a desire to fulfil her vow of obedience, may have all contributed towards the contradictions in her earlier and later stances. I’m not famous, but if I was suddenly substituted for a lookee-likee, don’t you think my family, neighbours and friends might notice? I’m afraid I can’t give Chojnowski’s theory any credence. And, of course, it’s become an ‘apostolate’, so money will be involved somewhere. I checked and Chojnowski’s website does have a ‘Donate’ page. Naturally.

Although Chojnowski quotes several professionals who support his theory, and he grudgingly admitted one came back with a neutral result, I wonder if any more that were contacted didn’t agree with this theory and if he’s conveniently airbrushed those out of the equation.

Another point – I have one of those booklets from the Coimbra Carmel, written by a Sister Maria Celina de Jesus Crucificado, OCD. Most of it is quite predictable, taking the Vatican party-line on everything. However, even in a booklet like this, which appears to have been written to conform to the Vatican agenda, I feel that Heaven has allowed something to be inadvertently revealed, which appears to contradict the tone of the booklet. On page 45, the following is stated:-

“It was in the year 2003, on 26th May. I went with her (Sister Lucia) to the lower choir in order to take a photograph of her with the image of the Immaculate Heart of Mary which had just been given to us. It is this photograph which has been used for the cover of this booklet. When I had taken the photograph, Sister Lucia continued to gaze at the Image. I did not disturb her. Then, turning to me, she said anxiously: “Our Lady is crying!!!” I think that, thanks to her extraordinary purity, her “ingenuousness”, she who had been the recipient of so many visions that no-one else had seen, thought at that moment that I, too, could see what she saw. And I, thinking that her statement was a question, said “No, she’s not”. I saw that she looked ‘caught out’, so to speak, like a child whose mother finds her stealing the jam! I said nothing. I thought that I should not ask any questions. I have not spoken of this incident until now. And I wished that that particular image should watch over her mortal remains with her motherly gaze until they were due to be taken to the Cathedral in Coimbra.”

If Our Lady knew that Her wishes had been fulfilled in 1984; that the Consecration of Russia to Her Immaculate Heart had been accomplished, and that the full Third Secret had been revealed in 2000 – why did She reveal Herself crying to Sister Lucia in 2003? These tears of Our Lady, witnessed by Sister Lucia, and unwittingly revealed by Sister Maria Celina de Jesus Crucificado, are another sign that Sr Lucia is the genuine article and that Our Lady’s requests haven’t been fulfilled. A fake would have said that Our Lady was smiling because the Consecration was done in 1984 and the full Secret released in 2000.

I once met Joao Marto – Francisco and Jacinta’s brother (he was the one who Lucia sent off to get Jacinta and Francisco just before Our Lady appeared at Valinhos, after they were kidnapped) the very first time I went to Fatima. It was in the mid 1980’s. He was born around 1906 so he would have been in his mid 80’s. I think we went the next year, or maybe it was the year after, and found out he had died. But there were many other living relatives of both families (Lucia’s and Jacinta/Francisco’s) in Aljustrel as well – Joao’s daughter, Jacinta Pereiro Marto, still lives in Aljustrel to this day. I’ve met her as well, and another man who was a Marto although I forget his name and relationship to the seers. They are surrounded by little piety shops in Aljustrel selling books and pictures depicting the supposed ‘fake’ Lucia, and don’t seem concerned by it. I’ve never got the impression they were part of a massive conspiracy.

While I think Fr Gruner may have flirted with the idea for a while (possibly egged on by Chojnowski who worked for the Fatima Network at that time – not any longer) to the best of my knowledge, he didn’t reflect this in the Fatima Crusader or any of his writings, even to the end. He just didn’t go down that road, and if anyone knew the Fatima issues inside out, it was Fr Gruner. In fact, he even did a YouTube video with John Vennari about it: Was There a Fake Sister Lucy? Fr Gruner also wouldn’t have been helping to publish, promote and sell Christopher Ferrara’s books through the Fatima Network when Ferrara makes it obvious he believes that there was only one Sr Lucia who was a victim of Vatican silencing, lies and machinations. By mentioning Fr Gruner and showing his picture, I felt Chojnowski made it appear in that LifeSite video, that he was part of this whole thing and supported Chojnowski’s views, which isn’t right because the YouTube video shows that Fr Gruner didn’t support his views.

Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, the author of the masterly trilogy on Fatima ‘The Whole Truth About Fatima’ never mentioned or entertained the theory even once to the best of my knowledge. The trilogy is out of print but available free online here: The Whole Truth About Fatima Joao Machado who runs the site, has also written a book called ‘Fatima, the Pope and America: The Decisive Battle’ advertised on the site, but it has to be purchased and I haven’t read it.

The trouble is with people like Chojnowski, once they get a bee in their bonnet about something, and build an ‘apostolate’ around it, taking money and staking their reputation on it, they seldom, if ever, tend to back down, and end up bending or ignoring any and every fact to suit their agenda. The Vatican simply wouldn’t need to resort to the drastic measures of ‘switching’ Lucia and risking a leak from literally countless people, when they already had a cloistered nun, forbidden to speak to outsiders without permission, committed to obedience and totally submissive to the will of her superiors, and as I said, if they had put a plant in there, they’d have made far more use of her to support their agenda than they did. Also, what does Chojnowski think happened to the ‘real’ Lucia? Did she die of natural causes or was she murdered? And what happened to her body? I’m not going to wait with bated breath for the next ‘gripping’ instalment in this saga. In my opinion, Chojnowski is off the rails, and so is anyone who gives credence to this nonsense, and shame on anyone for pushing it.
Live Mike
10 November 1959 - Pope John XXIII meets with Bishop Venâncio (now the Ordinary of Leiria-Fatima) and Cardinal Cento (the former Vatican nuncio who brought the Secret to Rome in 1957). In a handwritten note John XXIII refers to Sister Lúcia “who is now a good religious at Coimbra. The Holy Office will take care of everything to a good end.
- Christopher Ferrara, “The Secret Still Hidden”, p. 219. …More
10 November 1959 - Pope John XXIII meets with Bishop Venâncio (now the Ordinary of Leiria-Fatima) and Cardinal Cento (the former Vatican nuncio who brought the Secret to Rome in 1957). In a handwritten note John XXIII refers to Sister Lúcia “who is now a good religious at Coimbra. The Holy Office will take care of everything to a good end.
- Christopher Ferrara, “The Secret Still Hidden”, p. 219.

Shortly after this, Sister Lúcia is placed under an order of complete silence and not allowed to speak with almost any visitors.
- Father Paul Kramer, “The Devil´s Final Battle: Book II” 2010, p. 242
Live Mike
Silenced & imprisoned or murdered?
DrMaria
correct
Live Mike
Live Mike
There is reason to suggest the real Sr. Lucia may have been alive as late as 20 July 1987. Would the real Sr Lucia or an imposter contradict the official narrative coming from the bad guys that JPII had done the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary? Start reading at 1982.
Live Mike
If they kept her under lock and key as a prisoner, then she might have died of natural causes. She could have been murdered but was it really necessary if she were a prisoner in solitary confinement?
Live Mike
It seems to me that such a messenger of God would be far too valuable a source of information to kill... even to the servants of Satan.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
Who cares?
JFiat
I care! We should all care! Lucy was chosen by Our Lady! A faithful Christian always seeks Truth!
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
@JFiat and @Luke 817 -I respect your views, but I don't go in for conspiracy theories, like some reports saying that this was a false Lucia dos Santos. Just like there were reports awhile ago where come claimed that Paul VI was an imposter, that the real Paul VI had been silenced and a phony double took his place, a radical who ushered in the Novus Ordo, etc.
That was all nonsense ( to use nice …More
@JFiat and @Luke 817 -I respect your views, but I don't go in for conspiracy theories, like some reports saying that this was a false Lucia dos Santos. Just like there were reports awhile ago where come claimed that Paul VI was an imposter, that the real Paul VI had been silenced and a phony double took his place, a radical who ushered in the Novus Ordo, etc.
That was all nonsense ( to use nice language). Just like this probably is. People who go around looking at pictures of Sister Lucia and compare noses or teeth or facial structure really need to find interests in other things.
I got interested in the Church because, like I said a while back, I helped a now deceased Augustinian priest write a book about the disasters in the Church since Vatican II. I did all the leg work, compiling info and data from a dozen libraries, including 3 trips to Catholic U in D.C. I did all this on my last summer in college 7 1/2 years ago. I learned alot, and realized the disaster Vatican II really is.
But I have other interests too. I'm a high school teacher, I go to the gym 3x a week, I play tennis, pickleball, golf (sometimes/infrequently), and like going out once a week with friends. I also like to travel.
So although I contribute here, and one other site, and am concerned about the state of the Church under a heretic Pope, I don't let my mind wander into conspiracy theories that Sister Lucia dos Santos of Fatima wasn't the real Sr. Lucia, or that the original was imprisoned or murdered and replaced by a fake.
That's as nutty as some of these people today in the news, claiming that former President Trump planned and executed and lead an attempted insurrection and overthrow of the USA government over the election of 2020. Those people should all see psychiatrists.
C Z
look at the teeth. compare the teeth.
123jussi
With so many fakes in the Vatican there was no need for others.