@The New Knights Templar"How does one explain the superimposition of pictures of the shroud and the painting matching perfectly, unless you believe the shroud is false as well."
---
1. First of all, we have here a claim still to be proven. Could you link any sindonological publication analyzing and confirming the "perfect match"?
The video proves nothing if you look at the face reconstructed from the Shroud (e.g.
pinimg.com/…nals/d8/b7/d6/d8b7d6c0551d2cdace33c836b8c16b3a.jpg ) and the painting of Kazimirowski - they are different.
2. Sr. Faustyna noted in her Diary no dimensions of the painting - so most probably she considered them irrelevant.
3. There is of course possibility that Kazimirowski who painted the picture in 1934 modelled it on the Shroud of Turin. The Shroud became in the 1930's popular in Poland due to its public exposition and the work of K. Proszynski "Niesłychane odkrycie naukowe. Prawdziwa fotografja Pana Jezusa i ślady całej męki Jego na całunie" published in 1932 (published in English, in London, in 1933 under the title: The authentic „Photograph” of Christ).
4. Fourth, referring to the superimposition of pictures - the Divine Mercy cult in fact superimposed the work of Kazimirowski approved by sr. Faustyna with the later, completely different painting by A. Hyla. The above shows that the cultists have not treated the alleged revelations seriously.
May God bless you, too.
