Rome knows that the SSPX has been the true warriors of the faith and have kept alive the traditional Latin Mass that the innovators and revolutionaries have tried so hard to do away with...................,,, Holy Cannoli ....some people just have to keep being reminded of the Protestant service that they call 'in communion' with Rome. Yet they still don't 'get it' or just plain refuse to admit the Novus Ordo is a bomb, a joke but most of all a desecration to the Lord. They must enjoy watching women and young girls up in the sanctuaries taking the place of all male servers in hope of fostering future vocations to the priesthood...they must think nothing of their priests not using a communion plate and having the Host drop to the floor...or having an open homosexual/lesbian distribute communion to them.....oh, what an acceptable and tolerant church we've become. Lord have Mercy!

Traditionalists must submit.

Look at the bright side and think about how much fun you will have joining the "anything goes /Spirit of Vatican II / in union with Rome” crowd.

www.recongress.org/2005/pix/close/med_MVC-115S.jpg

marques.silvaclan.net/…/liturgical-danc…

4.bp.blogspot.com/…/0000abuses.jpg

douglawrence.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/indianmass01.jpg

cleansingfiredor.com/…/20110327_stmary…

www.wdtprs.com/images/10_12_27_Los_Angeles.jpg

1.bp.blogspot.com/…/espark.jpg

What does it mean to be "In union with Rome"?

Here's an example from Rochester, NY.

Bishop Clark has skirted Vatican authority at every turn, weakened the Catholic school system, confused parishioners through lenience on social issues, and turned the Rochester diocese into the most liberal district in the country. He’s shown benevolence towards gay and lesbian Catholics, given leadership roles to women not seen in other dioceses, and has generally been accepting of progressive theologians, such as Curran.

Yet, Bishop Clark is in “full communion” with Rome.

So, while being in "full communion" with Rome, Bishop Clark mocks the Catholic faith and its Traditional teachings, betrays Jesus Christ and it's all done with absolutely no fear of any negative consequences.

Evidently being in "full communion" with Rome has its advantages.

Is it any wonder many Catholics do not take the appellation of “full communion” (or threat of lack thereof) seriously?

There were Catholics in 1870 that refused to accept the doctrine of papal infallibility proclaimed by the First Vatican Council, and as a consequence, separated themselves from Rome, forming the “Old Catholic church”. There is one question, and one question only that must be asked of Bishop Fellay and his fellow Bishops without further delay. Is the SSPX prepared to assent to the Magisterium of Holy Mother Church in its entirety? If not, they should go into the wilderness and reflect on their disobedience. I am sorry to be so emphatic but the doubletalk emanating from the Society of St Pius X must cease. No priest, bishop or cardinal is greater than Holy Mother Church.

Posted on 19 July 2012 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

wdtprs.com/…/sspx-statement-…

Comments from Rorate Caeli:

Bishop Fellay has made it very clear through the years that he is in submission to Benedict XVI.

Rather there are high ranking members of the Curia that block Bishop Fellay's humble obedient intentions in action, towards the Holy Father, since those same Curial officials are not submissive to him themselves
----------------------------

70+ comments can be read Here.